Otis' Case
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
In December 1990, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee), in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 37(13), brought a petition to disbar the respondent, Attorney James D. Otis. The committee moved for a suspension of the respondent pending a determination of the disbarment petition, to which the respondent did not object, and he was temporarily suspended from the practice of law. By order of this court, a hearing before a referee {Maher, J.) was held. The referee found, by clear and convincing evidence, that Attorney Otis had violated the Rules of Professional Conduct…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bourdon's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Fitzpatrick's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Neelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Jones' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In Re AshySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.