Legal Opinion

Roerig v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 28, 1950No. 54179; protest 129447-K/5202 (Detroit)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The following memorandum, in which Oliver, Chief Judge, concurred, accompanied the order denying motion to dismiss:

Cole, Judge:

Five entries at the port of Detroit, Mich., covered importations of so-called darthronal and heptuna capsules, which were classified as coal-tar products under paragraph 28 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 28 (a)), carrying a duty assessment of 45 percent ad valorem and 7 cents per pound. Plaintiff claims that the commodities are classifiable under paragraph 23 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 23), which reads as follows:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Smith & Son Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Bush v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roerig v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API