Legal Opinion

Britt v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 12, 1916No. 1670PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7832 (T. D. 36030).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise in this case consists of Loeflund’s food maltose in tins and Loeflund’s malt soup stock in bottles, the individual packages containing less than 2⅜ pounds each. The importations were made under the tariff act of 1913.

The collector classified the articles as articles similar to medicinal compounds under the provisions of paragraph 17 for “medicinal compounds, combinations, and all similar articles dutiable under this section, except soap, whether specially provided for or not, put up in individual packages of two and one-half pounds or less gross weight,” and held that they…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dodge & Olcott v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monticelli Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. Smith & Son Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Alltransport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Scharf Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  5. United States v. FranklinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API