Legal Opinion

State v. Kulbe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1912No. 10029PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered September 23, 1911, upon a trial and conviction of grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

The grand jury of King county found an indictment against appellants, charging them with the crime of grand larceny in obtaining money under “false and fraudulent pretenses and representations.” Having been convicted, they appeal.

Two assignments of error are urged. Under the first assignment, error is predicated upon the court’s refusal to quash the indictment. This motion is based upon the ground that the appellants appeared as witnesses before the grand *22jury, and their names were not endorsed upon the indictment. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2043, provides that:

“When an indictment is found, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State v. KnowltonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. StratfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. ParkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API