Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2018No. 20170389PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Allen Rogers appeals from a district court judgment for gross sexual imposition ("GSI"). Rogers argues the district court: 1) violated his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial by closing his competency hearing on March 28, 2017; and 2) acted arbitrarily when it assigned extradition costs as restitution to this case. Because the district court did not make individualized findings supporting closure of the competency hearing, the Sixth Amendment public trial guarantee was violated.

*198The restitution award was proper, and it is affirmed consistent with our remand. We…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. PulkrabekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. LinnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. RollandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API