Legal Opinion

Koski v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1998No. Docket Nos. 104968, 104969, Calendar No. 13PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

The principal issue of law in this case is whether defendant-appellant Allstate may disclaim liability as a result of plaintiff-appellee’s failure to comply with a notice-of-suit provision in his homeowners policy. The Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court’s finding that Allstate was not prejudiced by any defect in plaintiff’s compliance with that notice provision. For the reasons that follow, however, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for entry of final judgment in favor of defendant-appellant Allstate.

i

This appeal arises from an underlying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wendel v. SwanbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. American Bumper and Manufacturing Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Weaver v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Weller v. CumminsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Koski v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Amway Distributors Benefits Association v. Northfield Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. DeFRAIN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API