ReMine ex rel. Liley v. District Court for the City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
LOHR, Justice.
In this original proceeding, we issued a rule to show cause directing the respondent district court1 to demonstrate why it did *1380not err in rejecting the challenges raised by Leeman Lee Liley, a defendant in a personal injury action, to the court’s jurisdiction over his person. We conclude that the purported service of process upon Liley by publication pursuant to court order was legally ineffective because, under the facts of this case, such service was not authorized by statute or court rule. Consequently, we make the rule absolute.
I
Grace Marie Vialpando and Ishmael Daniel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carlson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Hoen v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maggio v. Leeward Ventures, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. MarjanovicDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Colony Insurance Company v. Bristlecone Montessori SchoolDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Greene v. JJLV LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of ColoradoBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.