Legal Opinion

Hoen v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 28, 1966No. 22032PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McWilliams

This is an original proceeding and concerns chapter 119 of the Session Laws of 1965, which statute is sometimes referred to as the “long-arm” or “single act” statute, but will hereinafter be referred to as simply the statute.

The statute, insofar as it relates to the present controversy, provides as follows:

“Section 1. Jurisdiction of courts. (1) (a) Engaging in any act hereinafter enumerated by any person, whether or not a resident of the state of Colorado, either in person or by an agent, submits such person, and, if a natural person his personal representative, to the jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ogdon v. GianakosIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Jones v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Cooper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Saylors v. RiggsbeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Eudaily v. Harmon Ex Rel. HarmonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Vandermee v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR CO. OF ARAPAHOESupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API