Gardner v. State
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Justice.
This appeal raises the question whether the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969 (Water Right Act), section 37-92-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973, permits the water judge, in connection Wjth an application for a determination of abandonment filed under section 37-92-302(l*)(a), C.R.S.1973, to enter a decree that certain water rights of unknown persons have beén abandoned, when the only notice of the-application is its inclusion in the monthly resume published by the water clerk under section 37 — 92—302(3)(b), C.R.S.1973 (1979 Supp.). The water judge determined that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cartrade, Inc. v. Ford Dealers Advertising Ass'n of Southern CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Green v. Chaffee Ditch CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Nichols v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Elk-Rifle Water Company v. TempletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Knapp v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- City of Aurora v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.