Legal Opinion
Maggio v. Leeward Ventures, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 18, 1996No. CV 95-1477PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
In this action for specific performance of a contract for sale of real property, the defendants Leeward Ventures (“Leeward”), Barry Relinger (“Relinger”) and Gary A. Panusuk (“Panasuk”) (collectively “the defendants”) moved the Court for an order dismissing the action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the alternative the defendants moved for an order dismissing the complaint, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.
The plaintiff…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kunica v. St. Jean Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- United International Holdings, Inc. v. Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012