Heney v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING in mandate originally taken in the Supreme Court to compel the Secretary of State to issue a certificate of nomination to petitioner as party candidate for Governor. Dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Joseph H. Call, Daniel Sims, Bert Schlesinger, and John O’Gara, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is a proceeding in mandate which has been submitted for decision upon the petition and a demurrer interposed thereto.
The material facts as stated by the petition are as follows: At the recent primary election, petitioner and Thomas Lee Woolwine, who were each affiliated with the Democratic party for thirty-five days and more before the date of the primary election, as shown by their affidavits of registration, were candidates for the Democratic nomination for Governor of the state of California, as was also James Rolph, who was so affiliated with the Republican party, as shown by his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Socialist Party v. Uhl.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Saunders v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- In Re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Bancroft v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- People ex rel. Drew v. RodgersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Danskin v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Spreckels v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Madden v. Board of Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.