People ex rel. Drew v. Rodgers
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of tbe Superior Court of Sacramento County denying a new trial. A. P. Catlin, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
At the municipal election of the city of Sacramento, held in March, 1890, the relator was elected to the office of chief of police, and the first section of the act under which he was elected (Stats. 1871-72, p. 243) provided that he should enter upon the duties of his office on the first day of the month next succeeding his election, and should hold his office “for tbe term of two years, and until his successor is elected and qualified.” At the city election in 1892 the appellant received a majority of the votes cast for that office, and, having been duly declared elected, received a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. TiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Saunders v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Dryden v. SwinburneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hunter v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- People ex rel. Speed v. HartwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Heney v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Garcia v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- McDougall v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.