Bowles v. United States

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is the second appeal in this cause, the first opinion, which sets forth the facts very fully, being reported in (C. C. A.) 44 F.(2d) 115. We there held that the con-tempts charged against the respondent, Bowles, were not of the class punishable summarily, and that there was error in imposing punishment without giving him opportunity to answer or to produce witnesses in his defense. The ease was remanded in order that he might be given this opportunity and that the charges might be then passed upon in the light of all of the evidence, including the knowledge of the…