Legal Opinion
Lo Bosco v. Kure Engineering Ltd.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 11, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-2451PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is opened before the Court upon the plaintiffs appeal of Magistrate Judge Pisano’s ruling of November 3, 1994 granting defendant’s in limine motion to admit certain letters from plaintiff to defendant into evidence over plaintiffs objections under Federal Rule of Evidence 408. This matter has been decided upon the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons given below, the Court will vacate the decision of Judge Pisano. The Court will order that the letters are admissible under Rule…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Lo Bosco v. Kure Engineering Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. Contra Costa County Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Doe v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Dahlgren v. First National Bank of HoldregeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.