Legal Opinion

Moore v. George A. Hormel & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 5, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff served a notice of examination upon defendants whereby he sought to take the deposition of one Jay C. Hormel, President of both defendants, in New York City.

Defendant seeks an order directing that such deposition be taken at Austin, Minnesota, the principal place of business of the defendants and the place where the officer sought to be examined resides, and that plaintiff be required to pay defendants a reasonable counsel fee for the attendance of one attorney at the taking of the deposition, plus traveling expenses for said attorney, or in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  2. Clair v. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Fairwater Transp. Co. v. Chris-Craft Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haymes v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1976
  2. Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Haymes v. Columbia Pictures Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  4. State Ex Rel. Vanderpool Feed & Supply Co. v. SloanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. National Community Reinvestment Coalition v. Novastar Financial, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API