Haymes v. Columbia Pictures Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
This is a stockholder’s derivative action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. The defendants, challenging the existence of the necessary diversity, move before answer to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. The defendants contend that plaintiff is not a citizen of Nevada as alleged in her complaint, but is, in fact, a citizen of either New York or California. The defendants include a New York corporation and a California corporation. If their contention that plaintiff is a citizen of either New York or California is upheld, there is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Spanos v. Skouras Theatres CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Farquhar v. SheldenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Bischoff v. Boar's Head Provisions Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Bevilaqua v. BernsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.