Jemell v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). We need not consider the alleged errors of the plaintiff with regard to the giving and refusing of instructions, for the reason that the court should have directed a verdict in favor of the defendant.
Counsel for the plaintiff seek a reversal of the judgment on the authority of Adler v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 171 Ark. 419, 284 S. W. 729; Kelley v. De Queen & Eastern Ry. Co., 174 Ark. 1000, 298 S. W. 347, and other cases of like character which have construed § 8575 of 'Crawford & Moses’ Digest, which provides, in all suits against railroads for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelly v. DeQueen & Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. McClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Adler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grieb, County Clerk v. Natl. Bank of Ky.'s Rec.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Layne v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. LemonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Mo. Pac. Rd. Co., Baldwin, Trustees v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. TrotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.