Legal Opinion

Adler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 14, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). Under our statute it is the duty of the railroad to maintain a constant lookout, and if it appears that those in control of a train, in discharge of their statutory duty to keep a lookout, discovered or should have discovered a person upon or near the track in time to avert an injury to him, and failed to do so, the railroad becomes liable to him in damages, notwithstanding the fact of the contributory negligence of the person walking upon or near the track placed him in peril. Gregory v. Mo. Pac. Rd. Co., 168 Ark. 469; Davis v. Scott, 151 Ark. 34; and St.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Gregory v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jemell v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. TrotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API