Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. McClinton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 22, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This appeal is prosecuted to reverse a judgment recovered by appellee to compensate an injury sustained by him through the alleged negligence of the members of one of appellant’s switching crews;

Appellee was employed, at the time of his injury, by a compress company at West Memphis, Arkansas. The compress company has two rows of shed®, in which bales of cotton are stored, the larger being about 1,800' feet in length. The shorter row of sheds is parallel to the larger one. These rows are divided by partitions into sections, and the one at which appellee was working had eleven sections, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. HornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. John Munson Morris Margaret Morris v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Carner v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. Jones v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Cato v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API