Legal Opinion
Schuldt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1975No. File 11580PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Justice.
This is a declaratory judgment action to determine the legal effect of subrogation provisions in policies of automobile insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff. Plaintiff has appealed from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
On June 23, 1972, plaintiff’s 16-year-old daughter, Pamela Schuldt, a resident of plaintiff’s household, was injured when the automobile in which she was riding, owned and operated by a third party, was involved in an accident. As a result of the injuries suffered in this accident, Miss Schuldt incurred medical expenses…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- National Union Fire Insurance Company v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Shryock v. Mitchell Concrete Products, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Westphal v. Amco Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Brasel v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. DelzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Allstate Insurance v. ReitlerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- A. Unruh Chiropractic Clinic v. De Smet Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- S.D. Petroleum Release Compensation Fund v. BpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Hart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.