Legal Opinion
Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 4, 2008No. SC 17792Published
1Opinion of the Court
941 A.2d 309 (2008)
285 Conn. 716
W. Frederick RAVETTO
v.
TRITON THALASSIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
Raymond Bartko
v.
Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc., et al.
No. 17792.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Argued February 7, 2007.
Decided March 4, 2008.
Jeffrey S. Bagnell, Westport, with whom, on the brief, was Stephen P. Horner, Darien, for the appellants-appellees (plaintiffs).
William G. Ballaine, pro hac vice, with whom was Christopher G. Fretel, pro hac vice, New York City, for the appellees-appellants (defendants).
Marc P. Mercier, Manchester, filed a brief for the Connecticut Employment Lawyers…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cweklinsky v. Mobil Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.