Legal Opinion
Balesteri v. Holler
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1978No. Civ. 42027PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, 1 the only question presented is whether the trial court here properly concluded, as a matter of law, that the April 22, 1970, sale of the business by Balesteri to John F. and Geraldine Holler 2 (Holler) included the name of the business for a 10-year period. For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the judgment must be reversed.
The facts are not in dispute. 3 By a three-page bill of sale dated April 22, 1970, Balesteri 4 and her now deceased husband, Sam, sold to Holler a fishing business known as “Sam’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Swenson v. FileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Golden v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Mahlstedt v. FugitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hall v. HolstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garrick Development Co. v. Hayward Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank of OregonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Murphy v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Goodstein v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Dawson v. LohnWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.