Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Alfa Financial Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1999No. 1971089PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Sammy Lee Haynes, appeals from a partial summary judgment entered against him and in favor of the defendants Alfa Life Insurance Corporation and Alfa Financial Corporation (collectively "Alfa") and Ben Layton in Haynes's action alleging fraud. We dismiss the appeal ex mero motu.

The issue Haynes presents relates not only to Haynes's action against Alfa, but to a collateral action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama and a number of earlier actions against Alfa containing claims similar to those of Haynes. See Alfa Financial Corp. v. Key, 927…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Hines v. Riverside Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Precision American Corp. v. Leasing Service Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Grantham v. VanderzylSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. M.C. v. Tallassee Rehabilitation, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  4. SCI ALABAMA FUNERAL SERVICES v. HesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Ex Parte SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API