Legal Opinion

Grantham v. Vanderzyl

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 2001No. 1992265PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tammy Grantham filed a complaint in the Dale Circuit Court against Dr. Keith Vanderzyl. Grantham's complaint alleged assault and battery, the tort of outrage, and negligence or wantonness. The trial court entered a partial summary judgment in favor of Dr. Vanderzyl on the outrage claim; the summary-judgment order also purported to preclude Grantham from recovering, on any of her claims, damages based on lost income or on a fear of having contracted a communicable disease. The trial court entered another order purporting to make those rulings final under Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P. Grantham…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Road Serv. Co. v. InmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Thomas v. BSE Indus. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Haynes v. Alfa Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Precision American Corp. v. Leasing Service Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Morris v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Dzwonkowski v. Sonitrol of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. North Alabama Electric Cooperative v. New Hope Telephone CooperativeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. SCI ALABAMA FUNERAL SERVICES v. HesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Wilson v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs. Found., P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API