Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Simmons

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 11, 2000No. 1980570PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff Laura A. Simmons appealed to this Court from summary judgments in favor of Congress Life Insurance Company ("Congress") and Insurers Administrative Corporation ("IAC") on her claims alleging bad-faith refusal to pay, or to investigate, certain health-insurance claims. She also appealed from a partial summary judgment in favor of Congress and IAC on her claim alleging breach of the insurance contract. Congress and IAC cross-appealed from the trial court's denial of their motion to "reform" the insurance contract. We transferred the appeals to the Court of Civil Appeals, pursuant…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Gulf Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. GrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. LavoieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Congress Life Ins. Co. v. BarstowSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. James Snell v. United Specialty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  3. Hurst v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. State v. Brantley Land, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Samuel De Dios v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and Broadspire Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API