Legal Opinion

Everett v. State Farm General Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 2008No. E041807PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Agnes H. Everett (Everett) appeals after summary adjudication of issues and motion for judgment on the pleadings were granted in favor of defendant State Farm General Insurance Company (State Farm) in Everett’s action, which alleged breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, promissory fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and reformation. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In October 1991, Everett purchased a home for approximately $99,000 located on Chiquita Lane in San Bernardino, California. At…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Trishan Air, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Greystone Homes, Inc. v. Midtec, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Mercury Insurance v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Lee v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Lo v. Lee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API