Legal Opinion
Cheesman v. Amerada Petroleum Corporation
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 18, 1950No. 9846PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Chief Justice.
This is a Rule 37 suit, filed by appellee as plaintiff against the Railroad Commission of Texas, its members, and the appellants', to cancel order granting solely on the confiscation grounds of exception permit to drill D. C. Cheesman & Son No. 1 Skarda on Lot 19, Block 2, Cameron Addition, Bloomington Field, Victoria County, and to enjoin drilling and operation of the well. The appeal is from judgment 'for plaintiff, rendered after trial to the court, in cause No. 83,248, styled Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. D. C. Cheesman et al., 98th District Court, Travis County.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Jones v. Sun Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. CheesmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. and Mike Latta v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Miles v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Cheesman v. Amerada Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.