Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1948No. 9734PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

A Rule 37 case in which the Humble Oil & Refining Company is appellant and C. C. Cook and the Railroad Commission are appellees.

By stipulation of the parties, filed in the trial court, the issues to be tried were stated as follows: “If plaintiff (appellant) establishes that the C. C. Cook tract or lot identified in plaintiff’s petition and on which the involved permit was granted was created by a voluntary subdivision which was illegal under the conservation laws and rules of the Railroad Commission (that is to say, a subdivision which is required to be disregarded in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dallas County v. MillerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  3. Dallas County v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Midas Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Nash v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. L. A. Norris Truck Line v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Cheesman v. Amerada Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. M. L. C. Loan Corp. v. P. K. Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Shosid v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Capitol Steel & Iron Co. v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API