Legal Opinion

Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. Cheesman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1949No. 11947PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. O. MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by D. C. Chees-man in the District Court of Victoria County, Texas, against Amerada Petroleum Corporation and Paul Alois Skarda, seeking to establish -his undivided one-half interest of the seven-eighths leasehold working interest in the oil, gas and other minerals situated in -and under Lots 19 and 20 in Block 2 of the Cameron Addition to the Town of Bloomington, Victoria County, Texas, and to have his one-half interest in said minerals partitioned to him in kind.

A trial was had before the court without the intervention of a jury and resulted in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Greene v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Thomas v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Henderson v. ChesleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rayson v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard StratthausSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  3. Robertson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Cheesman v. Amerada Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. MassadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API