Legal Opinion

State v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 2003No. 01021796; A116621PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

This case presents a familiar pattern: A police officer lawfully stops a driver to investigate a traffic infraction and then, after citing the driver and returning documents, without any reasonable suspicion that the driver has committed a crime, asks permission to search the driver’s vehicle. The driver gives consent, and the search leads to contraband. The driver, now a defendant, moves to suppress the contraband as deriving from an unlawful search, and the state argues that defendant’s consent negates any illegality. See, e.g., State v. Toevs, 327 Or 525, 964 P2d 1007 (1998); State v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. AmayaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. RaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. BretchesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. RaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API