Legal Opinion

Blalock v. Clark.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1904PublishedCited by 26 opinions

ActioN by IT. B. Blalock & Company against W. D. Clark & Bros., beard by Judge O. U. Allen and a jury, at March Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Stanly County. From a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This case was before the Court, 133 N. C., 306, where the facts are fully stated.

The first exception, to the admission of the telegram, is without merit. It was proven by the operator at the sending office, who', though he was not the operator who sent it, testified that he brought it from the file in his office. Besides, the defendant in his testimony admits its receipt by him. The second exception, to the evidence of plaintiff that he had to go on the market to buy other cotton, at an advance, by reason of defendant’s failure to comply with bis contract, was competent. Elven if error, it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Old Dominion Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Blalock v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Jones v. Warren.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Brown Chemical Co. v. Atkinson, Cobb & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Simpson, Bass & Co. v. PegramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Claus v. Lee.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. State v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API