Legal Opinion

Blalock v. Clark.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1903PublishedCited by 16 opinions

ActioN by M. B. Blalock and Company against W. D. Clark and others, beard by Judge W. B. Allen at July Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Stanly County. From a judgment for the defendants the plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtGlaRK, C. J.

This is an action to recover damages for non-delivery of 200 bales of cotton. A witness, one of the plaintiffs, went to see the defendants 7th February. They had 200 bales for sale, which the witness sampled and asked an option upon them, to see if he could place them. The defendants on that day gave him this option, dated 7th February and signed by them: “We offer you 160 to 200 bales of cotton, grades as you have seen, at eight cents per pound, F. O. B., provided we do not receive better price by mail to-day. This offer closes by 8th February.” Later, on that day (7th February), the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Old Dominion Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Elizabeth City Cotton Mills v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Grandy v. . SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Claus v. Lee.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Blalock v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Hughes v. Knott.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. McAden v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Rocky Mount Savings & Trust Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API