Migneault v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
The sole question presented in this appeal is whether a party’s introduction of evidence upon an issue in an arbitration hearing will result in a waiver of the right to later question the arbitrability of that issue in a court of law.
Plaintiff-appellant Leo W. Migneault (hereinafter referred to as “insured”) en tered into an automobile insurance contract with defendant-appellee United Services Automobile Association (hereinafter referred to as “United”) sometime prior to November 16, 1971. The policy provided for uninsured motorist coverage. On November 16, 1971,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Allstate Insurance Company v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Verdex Steel & Construction Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- United Buying Service International Corp. v. United Buying Service of Northeastern New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
3Cited by10 opinions
- NJ Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. FranklinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Smith v. PinnamaneniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Hanson v. Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Jaffe v. NoceraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re Arbitration Between Grover & Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.