Legal Opinion

Migneault v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 18, 1974No. 2 CA-CIV 1530PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether a party’s introduction of evidence upon an issue in an arbitration hearing will result in a waiver of the right to later question the arbitrability of that issue in a court of law.

Plaintiff-appellant Leo W. Migneault (hereinafter referred to as “insured”) en tered into an automobile insurance contract with defendant-appellee United Services Automobile Association (hereinafter referred to as “United”) sometime prior to November 16, 1971. The policy provided for uninsured motorist coverage. On November 16, 1971,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Verdex Steel & Construction Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. United Buying Service International Corp. v. United Buying Service of Northeastern New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  5. Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. NJ Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. FranklinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Smith v. PinnamaneniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Hanson v. Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Jaffe v. NoceraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. In Re Arbitration Between Grover & Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API