Legal Opinion
Silverman v. Weil
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 19, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-2782PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge.
Defendants Donald Weil, Frank Stefanou and Frank & Company have filed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint. The defendants’ motions track the same arguments which formed the basis for this Court’s dismissals of the plaintiffs’ three earlier complaints. 1 In each of the prior efforts, the Court indulged the plaintiffs and granted leave to correct the defects plaguing the prior attempts and to file a legally sufficient complaint. However, the plaintiffs have failed for the fourth time to remedy their deficient pleading.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Posttape Associates v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kramer v. TribeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Tmg II v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- In re KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Silverman (Sylvan) v. Weil (Donald)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.