Legal Opinion

Tews v. Woolhiser

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1933No. 21807. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellees applied to appellant, as superintendent of public works of the village of Winnetka, for a building permit to construct a gasoline and oil automobile filling station upon block “A,” Manus’ Indian Hill subdivision of that village, hereinafter designated as block “A.” They filed with that application plans and specifications and the fee required by the ordinance of the village. Permit was refused on the ground, as stated, that the property on which the applicants propose to erect the gasoline station lies in the “A”-i/6 acre residential zone under the zoning ordinance, and by that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People Ex Rel. Deitenbeck v. Village of Oak ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Mills v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Krom v. City of ElmhurstIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  4. Ellicott v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  5. American Civil Liberties Union v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API