Legal Opinion
Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 6, 1939No. 9PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
delivered the. opinion of the Court.
The order which granted this Writ limits our consideration to the validity of Hayduck patents Nos. 1,449,103, 1,449,105, 1,449,106. They relate to processes for manu facturing baker’s yeast and are owned by the petitioner. It will be convenient to designate them by the last three figures of their office numbers — 103, 105, 106.
All three patents were declared invalid by the Circuit Court of Appeals below, 101 F. 2d 814. In the District Court for New Jersey, 103 had been adjudged valid; 105 and 106 invalid, 21 F. Supp. 46.
The District Court for Maryland in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fleischman Yeast Co. v. Federal Yeast CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1925
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Federal Yeast Corporation v. Fleischmann Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Standard Brands v. Federal Yeast CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1930
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1937
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Chemical Construction Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, Chemical Construction Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Sears, Roebuck and Company and the Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Eno v. Prime Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.