Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Co. of California v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 26, 1946No. 8605, 8658PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent suit in the usual form. The plaintiff asked for injunctive relief against further infringement, and an accounting. The trial court found for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals. A brief statement of the facts hack of the patent questions will be helpful to the understanding of the latter.
The Problem.
In the modern use of petroleum products as motor fuels, sulphur content is a serious detriment. The process of the patent in controversy 1 involves removal of sul phur from gasoline. Petroleum oil from the early days of the industry has been refined by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Deep Welding, Inc. v. Sciaky Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Corning Glass Works, in No. 15923 v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corporation, in No. 15924Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
- Corning Glass Works v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1966
- Philco Corporation v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.