Schmidt Construction Co. v. Becker-Johnson Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PLANK.
Plaintiff, Schmidt Construction Company (Schmidt),, and its attorney, Samuel F. Schoninger, appeal the trial court’s order assessing attorney fees, costs, and damages against them and in favor of defendant, Becker-Johnson Corporation. We affirm.
This dispute arose out of a disagreement as to who would pay water development fees on a construction project performed by Schmidt on property owned by Current, Inc. Becker-Johnson was the architectural engineer on the project.
The construction contract between Schmidt and Current contained an arbitration clause. It provided that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Pedlow v. StampSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Roa v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Talco, Ltd. v. DanielsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Oken v. HammerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Aurora v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- In re Marriage of AldrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Hewitt v. RiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Anderson v. PursellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. BerenbaumColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.