Legal Opinion

Henry & Wright Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the manufacture of dieing and drilling machines, seeks through this action a decree of this court adjudging it to be the owner of a German patent on the so-called Viktor drilling machine issued to the defendant while in its employ, requiring the defendant to assign same to plaintiff and to account to it for all funds, money or other property derived therefrom. The defendant became associated with the plaintiff in August, 1921. He was employed as general manager. From August, 1921, until October, 1926, he was also assistant treasurer and a director. As…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Dowse v. Federal Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
  5. United Shirt & Collar Co. v. BeattieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Talbot v. HarrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bedell v. Dictograph Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API