Legal Opinion

Talbot v. Harrison

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

Plaintiff, a minority stockholder of the defendant Bloomingdale Rubber Company, seeks an accounting from the defendant Harrison for sums of money received by him from the defendant corporation as royalties, pursuant to a resolution of the board of directors of the corporate defendant. These royalties were voted Harrison in consideration of the corporation’s right to *799use a secret process which he developed and the agreement on his part not to sell or dispose of or divulge it to a competitor.

I find (1) that Harrison while general manager and an officer of the defendant corporation had perfected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Continental Ins. Co. v. . N.Y. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. ArrottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  3. Dowse v. Federal Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
  4. Johnson Furnace & Engineering Co. v. Western Furnace Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  5. Lewis v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cahill v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Cahill v. ReganNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Samsung Elec.s Co., Ltd. v. MPEG LA, L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API