Legal Opinion

Sandy Beach Defense Fund v. City Council

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1989No. 12879PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*364OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

This appeal involves a challenge to the validity of the procedures employed by Appellee, the City and County of Honolulu (County) when acting upon applications for Special Management Area (SMA) use permits pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), Chapter 205A. Appellants, residents and community groups, challenge the County’s issuance of an SMA use permit to Appellee Kaiser Development Co. (Kaiser). They contend that the Honolulu City Council was required to hold a “contested case”1 hearing pursuant to the Hawaii…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kernan v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DudoitHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Morgan v. Planning Department, County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API