Kilakila ‘O Haleakala v. Board of Land and Natural Resources.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
ACOBA, J.,
with whom POLLACK, J., Joins.
I concur in the result, but write separately to address four issues related to the right of Petitioner/AppellanL-Appellant Kilakila ‘O Haleakalá (KOH) to a contested case hearing and subject matter jurisdiction.1 First, I would hold that jurisdiction over KOH’s claims arises independently under article XI, section 7 of the Hawaii Constitution2 in light of specific provisions therein protecting native Hawaiian rights. Second, Respondent/Appellee-Appellee Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) was required to hold a contested case…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. QuitogHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sandy Beach Defense Fund v. City CouncilHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.