State ex rel. Young v. Hays
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon information of the attorney general this court issued its writ of quo warranto directed to Ambrose Hays, requiring him to show by what right he held the office of county superintendent of schools of Le Sueur county.
1Opinion of the Court
ETjTjIOTT, j.
This is a quo warranto proceeding commenced in this court to de-. termine the right of the respondent, Ambrose Hays, to the office of county superintendent of schools of Le Sueur county, Minnesota. The respondent was elected county superintendent of schools of Le Sueur county at the November general election in 1906 for a term of two years from the first Monday in January, 1907. He duly qualified, and on January 7, 1907, entered upon the discharge of his duties. It is alleged in the writ that on January 5, 1908, he accepted *400and entered upon the duties of superintendent of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Ryan v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- State ex rel. Walker v. BusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Carmichael v. Northwestern Mutual Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Bechtel v. BechtelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Attorney General ex rel. Dust v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State ex rel. Klitzke v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 88Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Seley, Guardian v. HowellTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Hilton v. SwordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State ex rel. Village of Chisholm v. BergeronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.