Legal Opinion
Seley, Guardian v. Howell
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1926No. 4517PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge SPEER
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.
This cause is before the Supreme Court upon the following certificate from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Tenth District:
“This is an appeal by C. M. Seley, guardian of the estate of Van Burén Howell, N. C. M., from an order of the District Court directing him to pay Mrs. Sallie Howell, appellee herein, out of the estate of his ward the sum of §50.00 per month for her support.
“Van Burén Howell is a disabled veteran of the World War. . He is a person of unsound mind and guardianship on his estate-is pending in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hall v. FieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Roco v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- American National Bank v. CrugerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Hutchenrider v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Colter v. LukeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- In Re the Guardianship of the Estate of NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Kemp v. ArnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
- In Re Buckley's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- In the Matter Of: Jeani Maloy Hill, Debtor. Edmond J. Zielinski, Interim Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Jeani Maloy Hill v. Jeani Maloy HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.