State ex rel. Village of Chisholm v. Bergeron
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The respondents demur to the information on which the writ of quo warranto issued in this court, at the request of the attorney general. The relators are the village of Chisholm, Walter B. Brown and Anton Tanzig, who claim that respondents usurp and withhold from relators Brown and Tanzig their office as members of the water, light, power and building commission of the village, to which office ■said relators have been appointed.
The information states: The village was organized under chapter 145, p. 148, Laws 1885, and has a population of less than 10,000; in 1910 the village council duly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parish v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Sykes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State ex rel. Briggs v. McIlraithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- State ex rel. Young v. HaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Commissioners of Sinking Fund v. ByarsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rockwell v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Todd v. EsslingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Oikari v. Independent School District No. 40Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Benson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Dollenmayer v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.