Legal Opinion

Allen v. Dennie

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1989No. 17648PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HART, Judge Pro Tern.

Marge Allen appeals from a decision of the district court which affirmed a magistrate’s judgment that Allen was not an intended beneficiary of a trust.1 On appeal, we are asked to decide: (a) whether the instrument creating the trust is ambiguous; (b) whether Allen is an intended beneficiary of the trust; and (c) whether attorney fees should be awarded to the respondents. We affirm the district court’s decision upholding the magistrate’s judgment, but deny the request for attorney fees.

The facts are summarized briefly. Thomas S. Turner had three nieces; Mary, Lynn, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. DeLancey v. DeLanceyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Allen v. SheaIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christensen Family Trust v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Matter of Trusts Created by FergusonColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Penning v. FergusonColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API