Unisys Finance Corp. v. U S Vision, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
This appeal is from an order granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant-appellee on the basis of the running of the statute of limitations. Appellants argue that the lower court erred in applying Pennsylvania law to the statute of limitations issue because Pennsylvania is merely the disinterested forum state and it has no interest in applying its procedural or substantive law to the resolution of this contract action. We find this argument without merit and affirm.
Appellant-Unisys Finance Corporation (“Unisys”) sued appellee-U.S. Vision, Inc. (“U.S. Vision”) on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Freeman v. LawtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- AAMCO Transmissions, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Gwaltney v. StoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilson v. Transport Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Packer Society Hill Travel Agency, Inc. v. Presbyterian University of Pennsylvania Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Financial Bancorp, Inc. v. Pingree & Dahle, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Ario v. Underwriting Members of Lloyd's of London Syndicates 33, 205 & 506Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Carlino, S. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.