Ario v. Underwriting Members of Lloyd's of London Syndicates 33, 205 & 506
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge LEADBETTER.
In this action by the Liquidator for payment pursuant to a contract of reinsurance, the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment raising two issues: (1) whether the Liquidator’s action is barred by the statute of limitations; and, if not, (2) whether late notice of the claim relieved the defendants, Lloyd’s of London Syndicates 38 and 205 (Syndicates) of any obligation under the reinsurance contract. 1
In 1998, Reliance Insurance Company, acting through the New York office of broker, J & H Marsh & McLennan, Inc. (Marsh), issued a commercial…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Guggenheim Foundation v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Wilson v. Transport Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pacific Employers Ins Co v. Global Reinsurance Corp of AmeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- McDonald, E. v. Whitewater Challengers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Jennifer Oldham v. Penn State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
- Transport Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- J.O. Lozado v. WCAB (Dependable Concrete Work and UEGF)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.