Legal Opinion

Ario v. Underwriting Members of Lloyd's of London Syndicates 33, 205 & 506

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 2010No. 553 M.D. 2008PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge LEADBETTER.

In this action by the Liquidator for payment pursuant to a contract of reinsurance, the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment raising two issues: (1) whether the Liquidator’s action is barred by the statute of limitations; and, if not, (2) whether late notice of the claim relieved the defendants, Lloyd’s of London Syndicates 38 and 205 (Syndicates) of any obligation under the reinsurance contract. 1

In 1998, Reliance Insurance Company, acting through the New York office of broker, J & H Marsh & McLennan, Inc. (Marsh), issued a commercial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Guggenheim Foundation v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Wilson v. Transport Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pacific Employers Ins Co v. Global Reinsurance Corp of AmeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. McDonald, E. v. Whitewater Challengers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Jennifer Oldham v. Penn State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
  4. Transport Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. J.O. Lozado v. WCAB (Dependable Concrete Work and UEGF)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API