Legal Opinion

Carlino, S. v. Ethicon, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 2019No. 1129 EDA 2016; 1294 EDA 2016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY STABILE, J.:

In this product liability action, Appellants, Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon's parent company (collectively "Ethicon"), and Appellees, Sharon and Charles Carlino, appeal and cross-appeal, 1 respectively, from a judgment of $ 13,500,000.00 entered in favor of the Carlinos in *99 the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. The jury determined that Ms. Carlino suffered injuries from Ethicon's defective design of, and failure to provide adequate warnings about, the TVT device ("TVT"), a medical product used to treat stress urinary incontinence ("SUI"). The jury also…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marilyn Adams v. Zimmer US, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Hudson, L. v. Sundararajan, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Kennedy v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. M. Pizzuti v. PA Ins. Dept.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Martin, H. v. Seedorf, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API