Legal Opinion

Raymond v. White

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by Silas H. Raymond against T. Stewart White and Thomas Friant to recover an amount due under a contract for the manufacture of a patented article. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s court, and, upon appeal, was tried before the circuit judge without a jury. His findings of fact and law are as follows:

“The parties in this cause being in court by their respective attorneys, ready for trial, and the issue joined therein having been brought on for trial before the court without a jury, and the said court, having heard the proofs and allegations of the parties, and .the arguments of counsel, after mature deliberation therein, finds that on the 4th day of August, 1893, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendants,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Gillett v. BowmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by11 opinions

Alderton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
Roessler v. BurwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
Plastray Corporation v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
Phelps v. Shawprint, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
James Maccalum Printing Co. v. Graphite Compendius Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.